Mayers v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.
| Richard A. Mayers |
| Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al., Joey Boyd, Russ Winkler, Ronnie Williams, George Hurst, Bob Watson, Jeff Kerr, Brian McCatharenes, Derick Schofield, Tony Parker, f/n/u Holloway, Johnny Fitz, (f/n/u) Middleton and f/n/u Agnew |
| 3:2016cv00071 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 54), to which no party filed timely objections. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/20/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/5/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
