Taylor-Merideth v. Breese et al
| Dorethia Taylor-Merideth |
| Stephen Breese, Adam Wicker and Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools |
| 3:2016cv00612 |
| March 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 74 is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 59 ) is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUD ICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/21/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER: Report and Recommendations 48 is Adopted. Metro's Motions to Dismiss [21 and 45 are DENIED. Taylor-Merideth has not objected to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant Breese and Wicker's Motion to Dismiss 13 , and that motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/28/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
