Boyd v. Halley
| Kenneth Boyd |
| f/n/u Halley, Bill Rial, Jeff Bledsoe, Jerome Holts and Rhonda Felts |
| 3:2016cv00697 |
| March 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| John S. Bryant |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: Accordingly, the R & R is hereby ADOPTED, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/19/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
43
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36) be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/11/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/11/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
