Cunningham v. Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF et al
| Craig Cunningham |
| Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF, Craig Hecker, GRS Telecom, Inc., Paul Maduno, GIP Technology, Inc., Ada Maduno, Luis Martinez, Merchant Worthy, Inc., Robert Bernstein, Bari Bernstein, Mace Horowitz, Spectrum Health Solutions, Inc., John/Jane Does 1-5 and Gateway Sales and Marketing, LLC |
| 3:2016cv02629 |
| October 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER concerning award of damages on Default Judgment. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss ( 152 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants RCF, Craig Hecker, and RCF II are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 11/6/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER: Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by CallerID4, Luis Martinez, GIP Technology, Inc., Ada Maduno, and Paul Maduno1 ( 132 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants CallerID4, Luis Martinez, GIP Technology, Inc., Ada Mad uno, and Paul Maduno are DISMISSED with prejudice. In addition, Plaintiff's claims against the John and Jane Does 1-5 are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process upon them. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/9/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER setting conference call. (JBB)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ( 115 ) is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ( 66 ) is GRANTED in part (as to Count 1) and DENIED in part (as to Count 2). In addition, Defendants' request to strike Plaintiff's prayer for pro se attorneys' fees is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/31/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On July 24, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE # 114 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motions to Dismiss the plaintiff's earlier Complaints (Docket Nos. 31 , 35 , 50 , 90 ) are hereby TERMINATED as moot. The defendants have 28 days within which to answer or move to dismiss the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 55 ). This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/17/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (gb)
|
|
Filing
114
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation filed in this matter on July 21, 2017 (Doc. 112) is VACATED and replaced by the following recommendations. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS the amendment be allowed nunc pro tunc and Plaintif f's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 55) supersede all prior complaints in this matter. Should amendment be permitted, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's earlier complaints (Docs. 31, 35, 50, 90 ) be TERMINATED AS MOOT and Defendants be GRANTED twenty-eight (28) days to answer or move to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 7/24/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
