Jones v. Lindamood
Petitioner: Cedric Jones
Respondent: Cherry Lindamood
Case Number: 3:2016cv02631
Filed: October 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 332 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/27/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 324 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT: Petitioner's Motion to Quash the Indictment 288 is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts 289 is DENIED. The Motion to Take Judicial Notice Concerning a Di screpancy on the Face of Petitioner's Indictment 294 is DENIED. Motion to Take Judicial Notice of the Initial Phone Call to the Police Made by Petitioner's Wife 315 is DENIED. Petitioner's Motion to Consider These Procedural Def enses Concerning Trial Counsel Jack Byrd Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B) 290 and Motion to Consider These Exhaustion Defenses 296 are DENIED. Petitioner's Motion for Discovery 291 is DENIED. Petitioner's "Motion to T ake Judicial Notice of the Attached Exhibits and that the Petitioner's Motion for Discovery 291 is Applicable to this Case 297 " also is DENIED. Motion to Rename Docket re: 315 Motion 321 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/25/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 302 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT: Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment by Default is DENIED. The Court DENIES Petitioner's Motion to be Placed in a Single-Man Cell Pending Review or Be Released (Doc. No. 298). Plaintiff's 300 Motion t o Vacate and Set Aside Petitioners Conviction DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/4/2022. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
June 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 282 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT: Petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal 276 is DENIED AS MOOT. Petitioner's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Perjury, including his request for the appointmen t of a special prosecutor, 281 is DENIED. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is now ripe for review. No further filings are needed by either party at this time. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/18/2021. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 247 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/20/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 242 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/27/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 223 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/23/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 216 ORDER: Pending before the Court is a pro se "Motion to be Released Pending Review" filed by Petitioner Cedric Jones (Doc. No. 210 ). The Court concludes that, even assuming Petitioner has stated a substantial claim in his habeas petition, Petitioner's circumstances as described do not create an exceptional circumstance warranting release on bond pending a decision on his habeas petition. The Court, therefore, DENIES Petitioner's motion to be released pending review. (Doc. No. 210 ). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/3/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER: Having thoroughly reviewed the R&R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis. It appears that Petitioner is now in receipt of his legal file. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 188 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; and 2. Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), Preliminary Injunction or Alternatively for a Subpoena (Doc. No. 150 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/1/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 193 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court designates the "Supplemental/Amended Petition" filed on October 15, 2019 (Doc. No. 161 ) as the governing petition in this case, and no further amendments or supplements will be permitted by P etitioner; Petitioner's "Motion for an Order Instructing the Respondent to Answer the Petitioner's Granted Amended Petition or Release Him" (Doc. No. 185 ) is GRANTED insofar as Respondent is DIRECTED to file an amended answe r to the "Supplemental/Amended Petition" filed on October 15, 2019, within 60 days of entry of this Order; Petitioner's motion requesting an extension to respond to Respondent's Answer (Doc. No. 189 ) is GRANTED insofar as Pet itioner will be permitted to respond to Respondent's amended answer in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court; Respondent is DIRECTED to respond to Petitioner's "Motion for Discovery, to have Petitioner's Preliminary Hearing CD Transcribed, and a Petition for Proposed Interrogatories/Request for Admission to the Respondent" (Doc. No. 186 ) and "Motion to Take Notice of Judicial Facts" (Doc. No. 190 ) within 30 day s of entry of this Order; Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. No. 187 ) is DENIED. No further filings are required by Petitioner at this time. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/10/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
January 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 188 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 150 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Cedric Jones be denied as MOOT. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ORDER regarding disposition of files of the Petitioner. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)
July 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/11/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/2/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Lindamood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cedric Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cherry Lindamood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?