Ray v. Correction Corporation of America et al
| Johnathan Ray |
| Correction Corporation of America, f/n/u Rivers and f/n/u Angel |
| 3:2016cv02726 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Trousdale |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On August 3, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #15), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 41.01. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/21/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In light of the lack of any activity in this case since November 2016 and Ray's failure to respond to the Court's orders, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this lawsuit be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under F ederal Rule 41(b) and Local Rule 41.01. Any party has fourteen days after being served with this report and recommendation in which to file any written objections to it. A party who opposes any objections that are filed may file a response within f ourteen days after being served with the objections. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file specific objections within fourteen days of receipt of this report and recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of the matters disposed of therein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/3/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT & ORDER: Assessing Filing Fee $350.00 for Johnathan Ray. Because it appears from Plaintiff's submission that he lacks the funds to pay the entire filing fee in advance, his application to proceed as a paupe r (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. The clerk of court MUST send a copy of this Order to the Warden of TTCC to ensure compliance with that portion of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 pertaining to the payment of the filing fee. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to send Plaint iff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Defendants Angel and CCA. Plaintiff MUST complete the service packets and return them to the Clerk's Office within 21 days of the date of this Order. Upon return of the complete d service packets, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b) (1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/31/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(Warden sent copy of order by certified mail.) (Pro se party sent (2) service packets by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
