Goodman v. UPA et al
| Wanda Y. Goodman |
| UPA, A.J. L/N/U, Brad Roberts, Ed L/N/U, Desiree Miller and Angela Henson |
| 3:2016cv02780 |
| October 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Joe Brown |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On February 28, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #11), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findi ngs of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4m. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/23/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 3/24/2017 (eh).
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obtain service of process as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 2/28/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
