Gekas v. HCA Corporation et al
| James Constantine Gekas |
| HCA Corporation, Mitchell Wiatrak, David Reyes, Law Firm Gideon, et al., C. J. Gideon, Heather Piper, Kelly Duggan and John Wilters |
| 3:2017cv00009 |
| January 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Jeffery S. Frensley |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Report and Recommendation ( 27 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss ( 18 ) is GRANTED insofar as it seek dismissal of Dr. Gekas's federal claims, and those claims are hereby DISMISSED WI TH PREJUDICE; and the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Dr. Gekas's state law claims, and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/5/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss" ( 18 ) be GRANTED and that the claims against Defendants be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 1/25/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
