Slinger v. PendaForm Company, The
| Jack L Slinger |
| PendaForm Company, The |
| 3:2017cv00723 |
| April 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: As discussed above, the second motion to amend the answer (encompassed within the Motion for Relief) is not cognizable because it was unjustifiedly filed too late. This is fatal to the entire Motion for Relief. Accord ingly, the Motion for Relief (Doc. No. 180 ) will be DENIED. This leaves nothing for the Court to do to "conclude this story," in the words of the Sixth Circuit, other than to enter judgment, which the Court intends to do in the same amo unts reflected in the prior judgment in this case (Doc. No. 132 ) it had entered prior to the last appeal to the Sixth Circuit, except possibly with an increase in the amount for prejudgment interest based on the lapse of time between the origina l judgment (March 3, 2021) and the present day. By June 1, 2023, the parties shall submit either separate proposals or a joint proposal for the figure for prejudgment interest to include in the anticipated judgment. An appropriate judgment thereafter will be entered. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/22/2023. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 52. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 01/13/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Given the Court's conclusion that the Non- Solicitation Clause is unenforceable and that Defendant has lost its prerogative to assert other causes to justify Plaintiff's termination, and the parties' mut ual assertions that the essential facts are not in dispute, there is no need to effectively reopen the bench trial for additional testimony. The Court will instead proceed directly issuing findings of facts and conclusions of law as soon as feasible. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/8/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, by October 23, counsel for the parties shall: (a) confer with one another about the issues that remain to be decided, when they should be decided, and how they should be decided; and (b) file a joint noti ce to the Court setting forth any mutually agreed recommendations they have on these issues and, to the extent they do not mutually agree, their respective differing views. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/13/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/3/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Slinger v. PendaForm Company, The | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jack L Slinger | |
| Represented By: | John C. Hayworth |
| Represented By: | Paige Ayres Nutini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PendaForm Company, The | |
| Represented By: | William A. Blue, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Steven Kruzel |
| Represented By: | Sean Scullen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
