Campbell v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
| Desmond Jabari Campbell |
| Rutherford County, Tennessee, Shane McFarland, R.C.A.D.C., R.C.W.C., Robert Arnold, Bernard Salandy and Ernest G. Burgess |
| 3:2017cv00797 |
| May 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; Plaintiff's Response in opposition to the Magistrate Judge['s] Recommendation; Request for an extension of time; and Request for Judgment [sic] by Default, (Do c. No. 26 ) is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21 ) is GRANTED; and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/2/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21) be GRANTED and that Campbell's claims be DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/23/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
