Giles v. Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Giles v. Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools

Giles v. Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools

Plaintiff:	Jill R. Giles
Defendant:	Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools
Case Number:	3:2017cv00896
Filed:	May 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Wilson
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2018	Filing 123 ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Doc. Nos. 85 , 86 ) and Defendant's Motions in Limine (Doc. Nos. 72 - 84 , 87 ). The Court held a pretrial conference on October 12, 2018. For the reasons stated on th e record during the pretrial conference, the Court rules as follows: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to preclude leading questions by Defendant (Doc. No. 85 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of collateral sourc e benefits (Doc. No. 86 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of travel of other homebound teachers (Doc. No. 72 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of Plaintiff's accolades and achievements (Doc. No. 73 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of other lawsuits or settlements with Defendant (Doc. No. 74 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of misrepresentation of benefits (Doc. No. 75 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of individuals who were disciplined for attendance (Doc. No. 76 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence incorporating additional twelve weeks of leave into Defendant's attendance policy (Doc. No. 77 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of Plaintiff's diagnosis (Doc. No. 78 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evi dence of accommodations not requested by Plaintiff (Doc. No. 79 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding emails thanking Plaintiff (Doc. No. 80 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence equating FMLA prote cted leave to a reasonable accommodation under the ADA (Doc. No. 81 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of lost wages (Doc. No. 82 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that Defendant did not counsel Plaintiff regarding her absences (Doc. No. 83 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that Defendant did not consult with Plaintiff regarding homebound teaching position (Doc. No. 84 ) is DENIED; and Defend ant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that a private bathroom was needed as a reasonable accommodation (Doc. No. 87 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/15/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified text on 10/15/2018 (mg).
September 28, 2018	Filing 70 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/28/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2018

Filing 123 ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Doc. Nos. 85 , 86 ) and Defendant's Motions in Limine (Doc. Nos. 72 - 84 , 87 ). The Court held a pretrial conference on October 12, 2018. For the reasons stated on th e record during the pretrial conference, the Court rules as follows: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to preclude leading questions by Defendant (Doc. No. 85 ) is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of collateral sourc e benefits (Doc. No. 86 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of travel of other homebound teachers (Doc. No. 72 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of Plaintiff's accolades and achievements (Doc. No. 73 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of other lawsuits or settlements with Defendant (Doc. No. 74 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of misrepresentation of benefits (Doc. No. 75 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of individuals who were disciplined for attendance (Doc. No. 76 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence incorporating additional twelve weeks of leave into Defendant's attendance policy (Doc. No. 77 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of Plaintiff's diagnosis (Doc. No. 78 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evi dence of accommodations not requested by Plaintiff (Doc. No. 79 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding emails thanking Plaintiff (Doc. No. 80 ) is GRANTED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence equating FMLA prote cted leave to a reasonable accommodation under the ADA (Doc. No. 81 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence of lost wages (Doc. No. 82 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that Defendant did not counsel Plaintiff regarding her absences (Doc. No. 83 ) is DENIED; Defendant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that Defendant did not consult with Plaintiff regarding homebound teaching position (Doc. No. 84 ) is DENIED; and Defend ant's Motion in Limine regarding evidence that a private bathroom was needed as a reasonable accommodation (Doc. No. 87 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/15/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified text on 10/15/2018 (mg).

September 28, 2018

Filing 70 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/28/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giles v. Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jill R. Giles
Represented By:	Douglas B. Janney, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson County Board of Education and/or Wilson County Schools
Represented By:	Thomas William A. Caldwell
Represented By:	W. Carl Spining
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?