Liebman et al v. Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare et al
| 3:2017cv00902 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
440
ORDER: Pending before the Court is the United States' Motion for Leave to File Declaration Supporting its Motion for Review of Nondispositive Order of Magistrate Judge. 425 . For the reasons stated in the Order reviewing the Magistrate Judge's May 10, 2023 Nondispositive Order 439 , the motion for leave to file declaration in support of the Motion for Review is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/17/2023. (kc)
|
|
Filing
337
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The parties' Motion 333 is DENIED to the extent that the Court does not believe that a discovery conference is necessary to rule upon the issues detailed in the joint discovery dispute statement. However, the C ourt will GRANT relief, including as to Methodist's request for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 5/10/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing
232
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/11/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing
214
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/6/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT: Relators' motion for leave to amend 154 is granted. The Clerk is directed to separately file the third amended complaint and accompanying exhibits, which are presently found at Docket Nos. [154-1], [154-2], and [154-3]. Once filed, the third amended complaint is the legally operative complaint, thus rendering moot Defendants' pending motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is therefore directed to terminate that motion 79 without prejudice to refiling as to the third amended complaint as appropriate. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the third amended complaint as directed by Rule 15(a) (3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 5/12/2021. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Liebman et al v. Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
