Stuart C. Irby Company v. Thompson Brown, Inc. et al
| Stuart C. Irby Company |
| Thompson Brown, Inc., Michael Brown, Keli Brown and James Moore |
| 3:2017cv01071 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Barbara D. Holmes |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER: Stuart Irby's motion for issuance of a bench warrant for Michael Brown (Docket No. 114) is GRANTED. Stuart Irby's renewed motion for issuance of a bench warrant for Keli Brown (Docket No. 103) is GRANTED. Stuart Irby's motion for issuance of writ of execution (Docket No. 115) is GRANTED with the appropriate writ to be in accordance with the Court's procedures for writs of execution (found on the Court's website) or further instruction from the U.S. Marshal. T he stay of the Court's civil monetary contempt sanction of $50 per day found in the 8/11/2020 order (see Docket No. 106 at 5) is LIFTED, and the amounts due and accruing are recoverable by all enforceable collection means. To the extent t here remains any dispute between Stuart Irby and Defendant James Moore over post-judgment discovery, such dispute may be brought to the attention of the Court by an appropriate motion to compel or for a protective order. The Clerk is directed to se nd a copy of this Order by first class mail only to Defendants Thompson Brown, Inc., Michael Brown, and Keli Brown at the addresses listed in the certificate of service of Docket No. 114. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 11/18/2020. (xc:Pro se party, Defendants Thompson Brown, Inc., Michael Brown, and Keli Brown by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Stuart C. Irby Company's motion for issuance of a bench warrant for Defendant Keli Brown (Docket No. 105 ), which is CONDITIONALLY DENIED. However, the Court will ho ld another show cause hearing on October 6, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee, for which Defendants must appear either in person or through counsel and must also provide at that same time (or i n advance) full and complete responses to the post-judgment discovery that is appended as Exhibit A, or show cause why they should not be held in further contempt for their failure to respond to the post-judgment discovery. Defendants are FORWAR NED that failure to appear at this hearing will result in the issuance of a bench warrant, to the extent permitted by law, for their arrest and appearance in this district, which will be executed by the United States Marshal's Service. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Show Cause by first class mail only to Defendants Michael Brown and Thompson Brown, Inc. c/o Michael Brown at 3623 6th Avenue W., Palmetto, FL 34221. The Clerk is further directed t o send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Show Cause by certified mail and first class mail to Keli Brown at 221 Scarlet Ridge Ct., Brentwood, TN 37027. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 8/11/2020. (Attachments: # 1 E xhibit A-Post Judgment Discovery) (xc:Pro se parties Michael and Thompson Brown by regular mail; Pro se party Keli Brown by regular and certified mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
