Roan v. Mitchell et al

Roan v. Mitchell et al

Plaintiff:	Patrick Roan
Defendant:	United Postal Service and Kim Mitchell
Case Number:	3:2017cv01178
Filed:	August 22, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Barbara D. Holmes
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 20, 2019	Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 65) are OVERRULED. The R&R's findings and conclusions are ACCEPTED, with the modifications noted herein, and the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/20/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
April 15, 2019	Filing 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the forgoing, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 47) filed by Defendants United Parcel Service, Inc., and Kim Mitchell be GRANTED and that this lawsuit be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 4/15/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 20, 2019

Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 65) are OVERRULED. The R&R's findings and conclusions are ACCEPTED, with the modifications noted herein, and the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/20/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

April 15, 2019

Filing 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the forgoing, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 47) filed by Defendants United Parcel Service, Inc., and Kim Mitchell be GRANTED and that this lawsuit be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 4/15/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roan v. Mitchell et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Roan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Postal Service
Represented By:	J. Day Peake, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Mitchell
Represented By:	J. Day Peake, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?