Gywn v. Pressen et al
| James Gywn |
| Joseph Pressen and Ricoh USA, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv01217 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Jeffery S. Frensley |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER: Pending before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Favor and Reward (Docket No. 9), to which Defendants have filed a Response (Docket No. 12). To the extent this document is a Motion, it is DENIED, but the court has considered its al legations as part of Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege the required elements for a Title VII race discrimination claim.4 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is approved, Defendants' Motion for Ju dgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 6) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/3/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 2/22/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
