Howell v. Gonzalez et al
Matthew Howell |
Juan Marcos Gonzalez, William Durham and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee |
3:2017cv01413 |
October 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Joe Brown |
Waverly D. Crenshaw |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 115 ) GRANTED. The Motion to Stay and Sever (Doc. No. 113 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The claims shall not be severed. Pending the return of Defendant Gonzalez, this case is STAYED, and the case file is administratively closed. The parties shall file a joint notice within 30 days of Defendant Gonzalez's return. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/24/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
Filing 111 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/17/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/4/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
Filing 102 MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 3/31/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.