Willis v. Parker et al
Plaintiff: Howard Hawk Willis
Defendant: Tony Parker, Centurion of Tennessee, Kenneth Williams and Marina Cadreche
Case Number: 3:2017cv01423
Filed: November 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Barbara D. Holmes
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: On November 6, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #51), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the claims against defendant Centurion of Tennessee, LLC and Dr. Maria Cadreche are DISMISSED, and this case is DISMISSED in its entirety. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/17/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 25 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kenneth Williams, Tony Parker. For the reasons set out above, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 25) of Defendants Tony Parker and Kenneth Williams be GRANTED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's claims under the ADA and the Tennessee Constitution be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (2) Plaintiff's constitutional claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking injunctive and declaratory relief related to his need for medical treatment for the Hepatitis virus be DISMISSED in light of the class action case, Graham v. Davis, 3:16-cv-1954, that is currently ongoing within this Court and of which Plaintiff is a member of the class. ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation and must state with particularity the specific portions of this Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. See Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 72.03(b)(1). Failure to file written objections within the specified time can be deemed a waiver of the right to ap peal the District Court's Order regarding the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 8/6/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
November 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT AND ORDER Assessing Filing Fee $350 for Howard Hawk Willis, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. Hence, the claims against the Tennessee Department of Correction are DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e)(2). Upon return of the service packets, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE to the defendants. The plaintiff is forewarned that the failure to return the completed service packets within the time required could jeopardize his prosecution of th is action. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/27/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Warden of RMSI sent copy of this order by regular mail.) (Pro se party sent (4) service packets by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willis v. Parker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Hawk Willis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centurion of Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marina Cadreche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?