Akers v. Hildebrand et al
| Deborah L. Akers |
| Henry E. Hildebrand, III and Gregory Funding, LLC |
| 3:2017cv01470 |
| November 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court has conducted a de novo review of the record in its entirety and finds that the R&R accurately summarizes the facts and correctly states the law as applied to the arguments in the plaintiffs' Motion for Pr eliminary Injunction. Finding no error, the court OVERRULES the appellant's Objection (Doc. No. 28 ) and ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 26 ) in its entirety as this court's fin dings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 23 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/1/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that Akers' motion (Docket No. 23 ) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 5/24/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
