Hamby v. Parker et al
William D. Hamby, Jr. |
Tony Parker, Lynndy Houston-Fagan, f/n/u Mock, Centurion Corp. and Corizon Corp. |
3:2017cv01480 |
November 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Waverly D. Crenshaw |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/7/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification/Motion to Add Plaintiff's Suit to Class Action Lawsuit. Docket No. 15 . For the reasons stated herein, the unde rsigned recommends that Mr. Hamby's request for relief be Granted and that the instant action be dismissed based on his agreement to be in the class defined by Chief Judge Crenshaw in Charles Graham v. Russell L. Davis, 3:16-cv-1954 (M. D. Tenn.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 5/14/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/16/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.