Lunsford v. Shepherd et al
John Lunsford |
Don Shepherd, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and Progress Rail Services Corporation |
Geico Advantage |
3:2018cv00654 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
William L Campbell |
Barbara D Holmes |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re: #40 Order. (dt) |
|
Filing 39 PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL With Prejudice filed by Progress Rail Services Corporation, Don Shepherd. (Ramey, Shaun) |
|
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#37 : This document has been scanned. Documents generated from a word processor (Word of WordPerfect) should NOT be scanned, but rather printed directly to PDF via a PDF writer. Document must be text searchable. You do not have to refile this document, however, future scanned pleadings of this nature may require refiling. (dt) |
Filing 37 NOTICE of Settlement by John Lunsford (Gichner, Jason) |
|
Filing 35 PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL without Prejudice filed by Geico Advantage. (Hall, Maria) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice of Unnamed Defendant Geico by Geico Advantage. (Hall, Maria) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE# 33 : Discovery is not filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d)(1). This document is deleted from the docket. (dt) |
Filing 33 INTERROGATORIES Propounded to Progress Rail Services by John Lunsford.(Gichner, Jason) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#32 : This document has been scanned. Documents generated from a word processor (Word of WordPerfect) should NOT be scanned, but rather printed directly to PDF via a PDF writer. Document must be text searchable. You do not have to refile this document, however, future scanned pleadings of this nature may require refiling. (dt) |
Filing 32 JOINT CASE RESOLUTION AND STATUS REPORT filed by John Lunsford. (Gichner, Jason) Modified on 5/22/2019 (dt). |
|
Filing 30 ANSWER to #20 Amended Complaint by Don Shepherd.(Ramey, Shaun) |
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Shaun K. Ramey. (dt) |
Filing 28 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Progress Rail Services Corporation. (Ramey, Shaun) |
Filing 27 ANSWER to #20 Amended Complaint by Progress Rail Services Corporation.(Ramey, Shaun) |
Filing 26 SUMMONS returned executed by John Lunsford. Progress Rail Services Corporation served on 1/23/2019. (Gichner, Jason) |
Filing 25 SUMMONS returned executed by John Lunsford. Don Shepherd served on 1/25/2019. (Gichner, Jason) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Case Management Conference held on 1/24/2019; ORDER to enter. (Tape #digital recording.) (jwc) |
Filing 24 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Amended] filed by Geico Advantage, Progress Rail Services Corporation, Don Shepherd. (Ramey, Shaun) |
Filing 23 Summons issued as to Progress Rail Services Corporation. (dt) |
Filing 22 Summons issued as to Don Shepherd. (dt) |
Filing 21 Summons Returned Unexecuted by John Lunsford as to Don Shepherd. (Gichner, Jason) Modified on 1/22/2019 (dt). |
Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Progress Rail Services Corporation, Don Shepherd, filed by John Lunsford.(am) |
|
Filing 18 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party by John Lunsford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 2- Amended Complaint)(Gichner, Jason) |
|
Filing 16 Summons Reissued as to Don Shepherd. (dt) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by John Lunsford. (Gichner, Jason) |
Filing 14 Summons Returned Unexecuted by John Lunsford as to Don Shepherd. (Gichner, Jason) |
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes: Initial Case Management Conference held on 9/17/2018; 26 minutes; ORDER to enter. (Tape #digital recording.) (jwc) |
Filing 12 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by All Defendants. (Ramey, Shaun) |
Filing 11 Summons issued as to Don Shepherd. (dt) |
Filing 10 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation. (Ramey, Shaun) |
|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation (Ramey, Shaun) |
Notice to Filer re DE #7 : Pursuant to Local Rule 5.01, all filings shall include a Certificate of Service and it shall identify by name the person served, what was served, the method of service, and date of service. Counsel SHALL FILE a conformed Certificate of Service for this document using the Certificate event located under Other Documents. (dt) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation.(Ramey, Shaun) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation. (Ramey, Shaun) Modified on 7/26/2018 (dt). |
|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/17/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (dt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Maria Estes Hall, Jason Gichner, James P. McNamara and Shaun K. Ramey. (dt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Penske Truck Leasing Corporation from Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, case number 18C1477. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0650-2710307) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.