Johnson et al v. Tennessee State of
Plaintiff: Immanuel Johnson and Deon Garrett
Defendant: Tennessee State of
Case Number: 3:2018cv00716
Filed: August 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2018 Filing 11 Letter from Immanuel Johnson. (mg)
September 18, 2018 Filing 10 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Immanuel Johnson. (Note: Certificate of Prisoner Trust Fund Account Activity is incomplete.) (mg)
September 6, 2018 Filing 9 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Deon Garrett. (mg)
September 4, 2018 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Immanuel Johnson. (mg)
August 31, 2018 Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Deon Garrett. (am)
August 31, 2018 Filing 6 Letter regarding financial and legal paperwork from Deon Garrett. (am)
August 13, 2018 Filing 5 Prisoner Civil Rights by Immanuel Johnson. (am)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 Prisoner Civil Rights by Deon Garrett. (am)
August 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to both Immanuel Johnson and Deon Garrett. For any application to proceed in forma pauperis to be considered by the court, it must be accompanied by a certified copy of the inmate's trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6- month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate official at each prison in which the inmate has been confined during that 6-month period. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/10/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Pro se parties sent blank ifp (short) form by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs)
August 3, 2018 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs)
August 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tennessee State of, filed by Immanuel Johnson, Deon Garrett. (afs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2018: #1 Attachment Letter) (afs). (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/3/2018 with correct document) (afs).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson et al v. Tennessee State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Immanuel Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deon Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tennessee State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?