Blocker v. Foster et al
Plaintiff: Corey Blocker
Defendant: Raymond Foster and Francis King
Case Number: 3:2018cv00747
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment by Default filed by Corey Blocker. (af)
September 17, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by Corey Blocker. (mg)
September 4, 2018 Filing 9 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT re: #8 Order Dismissing Case. (mg)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: On the basis of the plaintiff's sworn statement that he is homeless and has no income, the IFP Application (Doc. No. #2 ) is GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file this matter in forma pauperis. Because the plaintiff has failed to clearly allege facts establishing that the court may exercise jurisdiction, the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This is the final Order in this case, for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/4/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
August 9, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jw)
August 9, 2018 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheetand blank, pro se forms included). (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Discovery Under Rule 26.02 of the T.R.C.P. Discovery Scope and Limits for this Court's Record filed by Corey Blocker. (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of First and Final Attempt to Settle Case by Corey Blocker. (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Discovery and for Request of Admission Under Rule 36.01 of the T.R.C.P. and Motion Stipulation About Discovery Procedure Under Rule 29 of the T.R.C.P. as Follows filed by Corey Blocker. (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION Demanding Trial by Jury Under Rule 38.03 of the T.R.C.P. Cases Removed to Trial Court filed by Corey Blocker. (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Corey Blocker. (jw)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raymond Foster and Francis King filed by Corey Blocker.(jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blocker v. Foster et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Francis King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey Blocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?