Woodland v. Hartford Life Insurance Company
| Glenn Woodland |
| Hartford Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2018cv00818 |
| August 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: The parties have submitted an acceptable initial case management order in this ERISA case. The court will sign the order, and the initial case management conference scheduled for October 29, 2018 is CANCELLED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/26/2018. (ds)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Glenn Woodland. (Travis, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Hartford Life Insurance Company. (Wahlheim, William) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hartford Life Insurance Company.(Wahlheim, William) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Marshall T. Cook. (jw) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed Hartford Life Insurance Company served on 9/11/2018. (jw) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint Hartford Life Insurance Company answer due 10/23/2018. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/2/2018. (jw)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Hartford Life Insurance Company. (Wahlheim, William) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Marshall T. Cook on behalf of Hartford Life Insurance Company (Cook, Marshall) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 3:30 PM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (mg) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Hartford Life Insurance Company. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for K. Cody Allison, Samuel D. Payne, and Lauren W. Travis. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-2742920), filed by Glenn Woodland. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodland v. Hartford Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | William B. Wahlheim, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Marshall T. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Glenn Woodland | |
| Represented By: | Samuel D. Payne |
| Represented By: | Lauren W. Travis |
| Represented By: | K. Cody Allison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
