Vaughn v. Tennessee, State of et al
Petitioner: Cathrin Ann Vaughn
Respondent: Tennessee, State of and Jennings H. Johns
Case Number: 3:2018cv01285
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: This matter has been dismissed, but petitioner Cathrin Ann Funk has filed a notice titled "Remove Sensitive Information," which the court construes as a motion to redact sensitive information from the petitioner's pleading. The pleading, including exhibits, is over 250 pages long. For simplicity, and to protect sensitive and confidential information pertaining to the petitioner's minor children contained within the exhibits to the pleading, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the exhibits to the pleading separately, as an attachment to the pleading, and to seal the attachment. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/27/18. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (dt)
December 13, 2018 Filing 4 Letter Requesting to Remove Sensitive Information filed by Cathrin Funk-Vaugh. (dt)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Because it plainly appears from the Petition and attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254, the petition is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order and the Petition, without exhibits, upon the Tennessee Attorney General. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/28/18. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail. Tennessee Attorney General w/ Order and Petition by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
November 15, 2018 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (dt)
November 13, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 receipt number 34675052598.), filed by Cathrin Ann Vaughn. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Receipt)(dt) Modified on 11/15/2018 (dt). (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/27/2018) (dt). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/27/2018: #2SEALED PER ORDER #5 Attachment - Supporting Documents) (dt). Modified on 12/27/2018 (dt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vaughn v. Tennessee, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tennessee, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jennings H. Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cathrin Ann Vaughn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?