Volkert, Inc. v. Financial Technology Corp.
| Volkert, Inc. |
| Financial Technology Corp. |
| 3:2018cv01344 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Summons Reissued as to Financial Technology Corp. (dt) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference is RESCHEDULED to 3:30 p.m, Monday, March 11, 2019, in Courtroom No. 764, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/28/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 3/11/2019 at 3:30 PM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (dt) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Volkert, Inc.. (Puryear, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Volkert, Inc. as to Financial Technology Corp.. (Puryear, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Volkert, Inc. as to Financial Technology Corp.. (Puryear, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED as to Financial Technology Corp. (dt) |
| Filing 6 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Volkert, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Business Entity Disclosure)(Puryear, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/4/2019 at 3:30 PM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (dt) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Financial Technology Corp. (Service copies will be picked up by counsel.) (dt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (dt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Daniel H. Puryear and Gregory H. Oakley. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Financial Technology Corp. (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-2809685), filed by Volkert, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - (Collective) SDS Foreign Judgment, #3 Exhibit 2 - Definitive Agreement, #4 Exhibit 3 - Amendment to Definitive Agreement, #5 Exhibit 4 - Second Amendment to Definitive Agreement)(jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Volkert, Inc. v. Financial Technology Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Volkert, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory H. Oakley |
| Represented By: | Daniel H. Puryear |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Financial Technology Corp. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
