McDonald v. Federal Communications Commission et al
Jessie D. McDonald |
Tennessee Elections Commission and Federal Communications Commission |
3:2019cv00072 |
January 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Civil Rights: Voting |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, the in forma pauperis application (Doc. No. 2) and the Motion for Leave (Doc. No. 3) are both DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED under Rule 41(b) for failure to comply with previous court orders. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/23/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) |
Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Accompanying #1 Petition by Jessie D. McDonald. (afs) Modified on 1/17/2019 (afs). |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jessie D. McDonald. (afs) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition against Federal Communications Commission, Tennessee Elections Commission, filed by Jessie D. McDonald. (afs) Modified on 1/17/2019 (afs). Modified on 1/17/2019 (afs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.