Tynes v. Genovese
Jereco A. Tynes |
Warden f/n/u Genovese |
3:2019cv00091 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Eli J Richardson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Tennessee Middle has been opened in Western District of Tennessee as case 2:19-cv-02095, filed 02/07/2019. (jm) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Petitioner Jereco A. Tynes, a state prisoner at the Turney Center Industrial Complex in Only, Tennessee, filed a pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. No. #1 ) and an application to proceed in this Court without prepaying fees and costs (Doc. No. #5 ). Because it appears from Petitioner's in forma pauperis application that he lacks sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee, Petitioner's application (Doc. No. #5 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis. 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Petitioner is notified all future submissions in this case should be directed to the Western District of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 2/7/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) |
***Civil Case Terminated per #6 Order. (jm) |
Civil case 3:19-cv-0091 electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis. (jm) |
Filing 5 (SIGNED) APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Jereco A. Tynes. (jm) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to RETURN the application to proceed in forma pauperis to Petitioner. If Petitioner seeks to have this Court consider his application, he MUST sign the application and return it to the Clerk's Office within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/25/2019. (xc:Pro se party sent a copy of this order and the original IFP by regular mail on 1/28/2019.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm) Modified on 1/28/2019 (jm). |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jereco A. Tynes. (afs) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jereco A. Tynes. (afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tynes v. Genovese | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jereco A. Tynes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden f/n/u Genovese | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.