Roan v. United Parcel Service, et al
| Patrick Roan |
| Kim Mitchell and United Parcel Service |
| 3:2019cv00291 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Kim Mitchell. (jm) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (jm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by EEOC of Dismissal and Suit Rights filed by Patrick Roan. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Supporting Documents)(jm) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to United Parcel Service. (jm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (jm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (jm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service (Filing Fee Paid), filed by Patrick Roan. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Supporting Documents, #2 Attachment 2 - Supporting Documents, #3 Attachment 3 - Supporting Documents, #4 Attachment 4 - Supporting Documents, #5 Attachment 5 - Supporting Documents, #6 Attachment 6 - Supporting Documents, #7 Attachment 7 - Supporting Documents)(jm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/10/2019: #8 Attachment Filing Fee Receipt) (jm). Modified text on 4/10/2019 (jm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
