Shaver v. Lowes Home Improvement Centers LLC et al
Teresa Shaver |
John Doe and Lowes Home Improvement Centers LLC |
3:2019cv00479 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Waverly D Crenshaw |
Barbara D Holmes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Lowes Home Improvement Centers LLC.(Spicer, Richard) |
Filing 5 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/6/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (gb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (gb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (gb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lowes Home Improvement Centers LLC from Circuit Court for Wilson County, case number 19CV250. (Filing fee paid $400 receipt number 0650-2927168) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet) (gb) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Richard E. Spicer, Lindsey M. Shepard and Nathan Cate. (gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.