Lee v. Slatery et al
| Sean W. Lee |
| Mark Gwyn and Herbert H. Slatery, III |
| 3:2019cv00496 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File In Forma Pauperis Motion by Sean W. Lee. (mg) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP application is incomplete. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank application to proceed IFP. If Plaintiff seeks to have this Court consider his complaint, he MUST either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full or complete the application to proceed IFP and return the properly completed application to the Court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/1/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with an IFP application.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (as) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (as) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Sean W. Lee. (as) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Gwyn, Herbert H. Slatery, III, filed by Sean W. Lee.(as) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
