Vest et al v. Nixon et al
| Chris Vest and Brandon Wooten |
| Virgil Ryan Belcher, Shad Teems, Kenneth Nixon, Nic Brooks and Jonathan Stoye |
| 3:2019cv00499 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Court acknowledges that this action has been DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 11/12/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chris Vest, Brandon Wooten (Harris, Jenna) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Based upon this status report, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to make the necessary filings to dismiss the case or to move for entry of default by November 8, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 10/29/19. (gb)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Chris Vest, Brandon Wooten of Status (Harris, Jenna) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The initial case management conference in this matter was continued to October 11, 2019, because no defendant had yet appeared. Two months later, that circumstance has not changed. The October 11, 2019 initial case management conference is therefore CANCELLED. Plaintiffs shall notify the Court by October 28, 2019, of how they will proceed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on October 7, 2019. (AN)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing by Chris Vest, Brandon Wooten Proofs of Service (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proofs of Service)(Harris, Jenna) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: An initial case management conference is set in this matter on August 13, 2019. ( #3 ) To date, no defendant has appeared in the action and the plaintiffs have filed no proofs of service. The initial case management conference is therefore CONTINUED to October 11, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint proposed initial case management order by no later than three days before that date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 8/7/19. (gb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 6/13/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (gb)
|
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Virgil Ryan Belcher, Nic Brooks, Kenneth Nixon, Jonathan Stoye and Shad Teems. (gb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (gb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Virgil Ryan Belcher, Nic Brooks, Kenneth Nixon, Jonathan Stoye, Shad Teems (Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 34675055227), filed by Brandon Wooten, Chris Vest. Service copies will be picked up by counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Text Exchange Between Belcher and Vest, #2 Exhibit B - Trademark Application, #3 Exhibit C - Screenshot of Web Promotion, #4 Exhibit D - Promotional Posts, #5 Exhibit E - Web Snapshot Promoting Live Shows, #6 Exhibit F - Webpage on Shopify, #7 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Attachment Receipt)(gb) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Jenna Lyn Harris and Chris L. Vlahos. (gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
