Van Buren v. Walmart Stores of America
| Kennith D.L. Van Buren |
| Walmart Stores of America and Scott A. Forman |
| 3:2019cv00533 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank form Complaint for Employment Discrimination. All documents Plaintiff files in this case in the future must include the docket number assigned to this case: 3:19-cv-00533. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/30/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Pro se party sent blank complaint form by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| NOTICE mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kennith D.L. Van Buren. (am) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart Stores of America, Scott A. Forman filed by Kennith D.L. Van Buren. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Right to Sue)(am) Modified Text on 6/28/2019 (am). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
