Steed v. Mayes
Petitioner: Reginald Cavoy Steed
Respondent: Tony Mayes
Case Number: 3:2019cv00568
Filed: July 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Tony Mayes.(Barker, Zachary)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Zachary L. Barker. (jw)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing by Tony Mayes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Technical Record on Direct Appeal, #2 Exhibit Volume I of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #3 Exhibit Volume II of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #4 Exhibit Volume III of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #5 Exhibit Volume IV of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #6 Exhibit Volume V of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #7 Exhibit Volume VI of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #8 Exhibit Volume VII of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #9 Exhibit Volume VIII of Trial Transcript on Direct Appeal, #10 Exhibit Exhibits from trial on Direct Appeal, #11 Exhibit Transcript of Sentencing Hearing on Direct Appeal, #12 Exhibit Exhibits from Sentencing Hearing on Direct Appeal, #13 Exhibit Transcript of Motion for a New Trial on Direct Appeal, #14 Exhibit Notice of Appeal on Direct Appeal, #15 Exhibit Docketing Statement on Direct Appeal, #16 Exhibit Brief of Appellant on Direct Appeal, #17 Exhibit Brief of State on Direct Appeal, #18 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Direct Appeal, #19 Exhibit Judgment of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Direct Appeal, #20 Exhibit Technical Record on Post-Conviction Appeal, #21 Exhibit Transcript of Post Conviction Hearing on Post-Conviction Appeal, #22 Exhibit Exhibits from Post-Conviction Hearing on Post-Conviction Appeal, #23 Exhibit Brief of Appellant on Post-Conviction Appeal, #24 Exhibit Brief of State on Post-Conviction Appeal, #25 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Post-Conviction Appeal, #26 Exhibit Judgment of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Post-Conviction Appeal, #27 Exhibit Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Petition, #28 Exhibit Second Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, #29 Exhibit Motion to Obtain Records, #30 Exhibit Uniform Affidavit of Indigency)(Barker, Zachary)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary L. Barker on behalf of Tony Mayes (Barker, Zachary)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Michael Matthew Stahl. (jw)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Matthew Stahl on behalf of Tony Mayes (Stahl, Michael)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Because it is not apparent from the Petition that Petitioner is not entitled to relief, Habeas Rule 4, Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the Petition in accordance with Habeas Rule 5 within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket, Respondent shall also file the complete state court record relevant to this matter, including the complete trial court record, the complete record on direct appeal, and the complete trial and appellate court record in connection with any state petition for collateral relief including, but not limited to, transcripts for all proceedings and rulings on any state petition. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/30/2019. (xc: Order to Pro se party; Petition and Order to Respondent and TN Attorney General by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw) Modified on 8/9/2019 (jw).
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for John H. Bledsoe, III. (jw)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bledsoe, III on behalf of Tony Mayes (Bledsoe, John)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECEIPT #34675055498 in the amount of $5 posted by Reginald Cavoy Steed re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jw)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (as)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (as)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Reginald Cavoy Steed. (as)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steed v. Mayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Cavoy Steed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tony Mayes
Represented By: Michael Matthew Stahl
Represented By: Zachary L. Barker
Represented By: John H. Bledsoe, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?