Powell v. Montgomery County Jail et al
| Abdullah H. Powell |
| Montgomery County Jail, f/n/u Littie and f/n/u Ryle |
| 3:2019cv00583 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiff's deficient IFP application (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Orders and take the necessary steps to proceed with this lawsuit. Any appeal from this order would not be in good faith as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/15/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Abdullah H. Powell. (am) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff's ability to submit an accurate and properly supported application. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff another blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (short form). If Plaintiff does not submit the new application and required trust account documentation within 28 days of entry of this Order, this lawsuit will be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/6/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Pro se party sent a blank IFP (short) form by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) Modified Text on 8/8/2019 (am).
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Abdullah H. Powell. (am) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY by Abdullah H. Powell. (am) Modified Text on 8/7/2019 (am). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff Abdullah Powell, an inmate currently confined in the Stewart County Detention Center in Dover, Tennessee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff did not submit with his complaint either the requisite $400 civil filing fee or an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (short form) and a copy of Administrative Order 93. To proceed with his lawsuit, Plaintiff MUST either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full or complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis and return the properly completed application to the Court. Plaintiff's payment or supported application must be received in this Court within 28 days of the date this Order is entered on the docket and must include the docket number assigned to this case: No. 3:19-589. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/23/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. )(Pro se party sent blank IFP (short) form and Admin Order 93 by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (afs) |
| (Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (afs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against f/n/u Littie, Montgomery County Jail, f/n/u Ryle, filed by Abdullah H. Powell.(afs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
