Corbin v. Brennan
Plaintiff: Stephanie Corbin
Defendant: Megan Brennan
Case Number: 3:2019cv00743
Filed: August 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: William L Campbell
Referring Judge: Alistair Newbern
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion to Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 10/18/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
October 18, 2019 Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 11/6/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (am)
October 16, 2019 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Continue /Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference by Stephanie Corbin. (Gentry, Autumn)
September 11, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Stephanie Corbin. Megan Brennan served on 8/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Green Card returned)(Gentry, Autumn)
September 3, 2019 TN State Bar status verified as active for Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon. (am)
August 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon on behalf of Megan Brennan (Maynor-Faulcon, Mercedes)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 8/26/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
August 23, 2019 Filing 7 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Stephanie Corbin. (am)
August 23, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (am)
August 23, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Megan Brennan, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General, Delner Franklin-Thomas. (Service copies issued at the front counter to Attorney.) (am)
August 23, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am)
August 23, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (am)
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Megan Brennan (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 34675056045), filed by Stephanie Corbin. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment - Receipt)(am)
August 23, 2019 TN State Bar status verified as active for Autumn Gentry. (am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Corbin v. Brennan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Megan Brennan
Represented By: Mercedes C. Maynor-Faulcon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Corbin
Represented By: Autumn Gentry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?