Nouri et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
| Ali Reza Nouri and Maryam Rivaz |
| United Airlines, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00853 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Accordingly, Defendant United Airlines' motion for a more definite statement (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Nouri and Rivaz are ORDERED to file an amended complaint by December 4, 2019, that sets forth all of their claims for relief, including the facts supporting each claim, and complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Nouri and Rivaz are warned that failure to comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that their claims be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern on 11/7/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. Pro se plaintiffs Ali Reza Nouri and Maryam Rivaz brought suit against United Airlines, Inc. in the General Sessions Court of Davidson County, Tennessee. United Airlines, Inc. removed the case to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1441 and 1446 on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. United Airlines, Inc. paid the filing fee of $400.00. This action is REFERRED to the magistrate judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/21/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of File Exhibit by Ali Reza Nouri, Maryam Rivaz (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Explain the Situation, #2 Exhibit B - Emial to United Airline and Attorney, #3 Exhibit C - Complain the case to BBB, #4 Exhibit D - Receipts for tickets from Turkey to Tehran, #5 Exhibit E - Receipt for file the Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - Hotel Expenses Receipt, #7 Exhibit G - Turkish Expenses Receipts, #8 Exhibit H - Iran Expenses Receipts, #9 Exhibit I - Change Flight Cost)(am) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support of #5 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by United Airlines, Inc. . (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for More Definite Statement by United Airlines, Inc.. (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 4 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by United Airlines, Inc.. (Rouse, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (am) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Airlines, Inc. from General Sessions Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, case number 19GC17316. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0650-3001691) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court File, #3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration)(am) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for John T. Rouse, Joseph V. Ronderos, Jr. (am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
