Lee v. Stewart et al
| Anabelle Lee |
| Scott Harding, Brian Wolters, Amber Stewart and David Griswald |
| 3:2019cv01004 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Defendants have filed an answer to the complaint, see Docket Entry No. #2 , and have recently filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry No. #6 ). Plaintiff shall have until February 10, 2020, to file a response to the motion. Plaintiff is advised that the case may be dismissed in whole or in part if a timely response to the motion is not filed by the response deadline. The Clerk is directed to send all orders entered in this case to the pro se Plaintiff by regular, first class mail (only), unless otherwise directed by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 12/31/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail along with previously entered Order #5 .) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified on 1/2/2020 (mg).
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Amber Stewart . (Loofbourrow, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Amber Stewart. (Loofbourrow, Ryan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 12/17/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE filed by Anabelle Lee to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Amber Stewart, David Griswald, Brian Wolters, Scott Harding. (dt) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet and blank, pro se forms included). (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Kevin C. Klein and Ryan P. Loofbourrow. (dt) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by David Griswald, Scott Harding, Amber Stewart, Brian Wolters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Numbered Complaint)(Loofbourrow, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by David Griswald, Scott Harding, Amber Stewart and Brian Wolters from Davidson County Circuit Court, case number 19C1920. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0650-3028771) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - General Sessions Record, #2 Exhibit - General Sessions Bill of Costs, #3 Exhibit - Circuit Court Notice, #4 Exhibit - Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement, #5 Exhibit - Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion, #6 Exhibit - Case Law in Support of Defendants' Motion, #7 Exhibit - Order Granting Defendants' Motion, #8 Exhibit - Circuit Court Complaint, #9 Exhibit - Exhibits Attached to Circuit Court Complaint, #10 Exhibit - Summons to Griswald, #11 Exhibit - Summons to Stewart, #12 Exhibit - Summons to Harding, #13 Exhibit - Summons to Wolters, #14 Exhibit - Return of Service for Stewart, #15 Exhibit - Return of Service for Griswald, #16 Exhibit - Return of Service for Wolters, #17 Exhibit - Return of Service for Harding, #18 Exhibit - Agreed Order Extending Defendants' Responsive Pleading Deadline, #19 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
