Sisk v. LLBJ, LLC
May Sisk |
LLBJ, LLC and LLBJ Real Estate Holdings |
3:2019cv01017 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Barbara D Holmes |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Summons issued as to LLBJ, LLC. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
Filing 13 First MOTION to Continue Initial Case MGMT Conf. by May Sisk. (Sanderson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12 ***DISREGARD, COUNSEL TO REFILE*** First MOTION to Continue Initial Case MGMT Conf. by May Sisk. (Sanderson, Jeffrey) Modified on 1/13/2020 (mg). |
Filing 11 ***DISREGARD*** First MOTION to Continue Initial Case MGMT Conf. by May Sisk. (Sanderson, Jeffrey) Modified on 1/13/2020 (mg). |
Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Docket No. #4 ) her application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and Document Number #5 shall be sealed. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Docket No. #5 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 01/03/2020. (mg) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Doc. No. #5 ) and Application to Proceed Informa Pauperis (Doc. No. #6 ) are REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for consideration and rulings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), and Local Rule 72.01. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/25/2019. (mg) (mg). |
Filing 8 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 11/21/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/13/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (hb) |
Filing 6 Sealed Motion App. to Proceed IFP filed by May Sisk. (Sanderson, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/19/2019 (gb). |
Filing 5 First MOTION to Seal App. to Proceed IFP by May Sisk. (Sanderson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (gb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Luke Sanderson. (gb) |
*** DISREGARD *** NOTICE TO COUNSEL Luke Sanderson: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $100.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 12/9/2019. (gb) Modified text on 11/25/2019 (gb). |
*** DISREGARD *** NOTICE TO COUNSEL Luke Sanderson: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(d)). Appearance by local counsel due by 12/9/2019. (gb) Modified text on 11/25/2019 (gb). |
Filing 2 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by May Sisk. (gb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LLBJ, LLC, filed by May Sisk. (Filing Fee not paid; Motion for IFP to be filed.) (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.