Gairnese v. Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC
| Christina Gairnese |
| Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC |
| 3:2019cv01038 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JOINT) filed by Christina Gairnese. (Street, Jonathan) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC answer due 1/10/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 1/13/2020. (gb)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC.(Simms, James) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (UNOPPOSED) by Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC. (Simms, James) |
| Filing 9 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC. (Simms, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Simms, IV on behalf of Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC (Simms, James) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by Christina Gairnese. Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC served on 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Signed Return Receipt)(Street, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 Summons issued as to Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC. (Service copies returned to counsel by mail.) (dt) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (jw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/21/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (gb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (gb) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Jonathan A. Street. (gb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC (Filing fee paid $400, Receipt number 0650-3034607), filed by Christina Gairnese. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-right to sue, #2 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet)(gb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gairnese v. Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Peachtree Planning of Tennessee, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James K. Simms, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christina Gairnese | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan A. Street |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
