Winslow v. City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
| Kenneth Winslow |
| Sam Smith and City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee |
| 3:2019cv01124 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Leave to Appear telephonically by Kenneth Winslow. (Nelson, Frederick) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/13/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of #11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Kenneth Winslow . (Nelson, Frederick) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Kenneth Winslow. (Nelson, Frederick) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Cassandra M. Crane and A. Ryan Simmons. (dt) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: This case is not yet ready for an initial case management conference. It is therefore ORDERED that the initial case management conference scheduled for February 10, 2020 is hereby RESET for March 23, 2020 at 3:15 p.m. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/5/2020. (dt)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Sam Smith.(Simmons, A.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by A. Ryan Simmons on behalf of City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Sam Smith (Simmons, A.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Cassandra M. Crane on behalf of City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Sam Smith (Crane, Cassandra) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Frederick H. Nelson and David J. Markese to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Kirk L. Davies on 12/19/19. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(Davies, Kirk)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Frederick H. Nelson and David J. Markese to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3052818) by Kenneth Winslow. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing (Markese), #2 Attachment cert of good standing (Nelson), #3 Attachment LR 83.01(b)(2) addendum (Markese), #4 Attachment LR 83.01(b)(2) addendum (Nelson))(Mosher, Kristin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/10/2020 at 2:15 PM in Chambers 825 before District Judge Aleta A. Trauger. (dt) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee and Sam Smith. (Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail.) (dt) Modified on 12/17/2019 (dt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Kristin Fecteau Mosher. FL State Bar status verified as active for Frederick H. Nelson and David J. Markese. (dt) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Frederick H. Nelson, David J. Markese: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $100.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 1/7/2020. (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee and Sam Smith (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3050983), filed by Kenneth Winslow. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
