Doe v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
| James Doe |
| Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee |
| 3:2020cv00004 |
| January 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Keli J. Oliver and Michael R. Dohn. (dt) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference. The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby reset for May 14, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 2/24/2020. (mg)
|
| Reset Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference is reset for 5/14/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. (Oliver, Keli) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Doe. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee waiver sent on 2/12/2020. (Crofford, Stephen) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 1/3/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/3/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Stephen C. Crofford, and Mary Ann Parker. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3058817), filed by James Doe. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee | |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Dohn |
| Represented By: | Keli J. Oliver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Doe | |
| Represented By: | Mary Ann Parker |
| Represented By: | Stephen C. Crofford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
