Trotter v. Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority et al
| Joe Trotter |
| Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority and Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Department of Safety |
| 3:2020cv00193 |
| March 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Aleta A Trauger |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| NOTICE mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
| Filing 3 Summons Reissued as to Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Department of Safety. (Pro se party put the incorrect address on the first summons but sent the summons to the correct address. This summons has the correct address on it.) (am) |
| Filing 2 Summons issued as to Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority, Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Department of Safety. (Service packets issued at the front counter.) (am) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority, Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority Department of Safety (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 34675058153), filed by Joe Trotter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - EEOC Right to Sue Letter, #2 Attachment - Receipt)(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
