Braxton v. State of Tennessee
| Frederick E. Braxton |
| State of Tennessee |
| 3:2020cv00251 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Order by State of Tennessee. (Bowen, Meredith) Modified on 5/21/2020 (vh). |
Filing 6
ORDER: Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer, plead or otherwise respond to the Petition in accordance with Habeas Rule 5 within 30 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket. Petitioner may file a reply to Respondent's answer limited to disputing specific points of fact or law raised in the answer within 30 DAYS of the date the answer is filed. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of Tennessee. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/24/2020. (xc:Pro se party, Respondent & AG (with copy of Habe Petition) by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #34675058625 in the amount of $5 posted by Frederick E. Braxton re #4 Order to pay filing fee. (vh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: To proceed in this action, Petitioner MUST either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a properly completed application to proceed as a pauper. Petitioner's submission must be received in this Court within 28 DAYS of the date this Order is entered on the docket and must include the assigned case number, No. 3:20-cv-00251. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Petitioner a blank application to proceed as a pauper. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/1/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail with blank IFP application. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
|
| TN State Bar status verified as active for Meredith Wood Bowen. (vh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Wood Bowen on behalf of State of Tennessee (Bowen, Meredith) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Frederick E. Braxton.(vh) |
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (vh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Braxton v. State of Tennessee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Frederick E. Braxton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Tennessee | |
| Represented By: | Meredith Wood Bowen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
