Haeuptle v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Kathryn Haeuptle
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Interested Party: SSA-Email Notification
Case Number: 3:2020cv00284
Filed: April 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Barbara D Holmes
Referring Judge: Eli J Richardson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General/USA on 5/18/2020. (dt)
May 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney/MDTN on 5/19/2020. (dt)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Bert Coleman on behalf of Social Security Administration (Coleman, Bert)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Bert W. Coleman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee not paid-due within 21 days) by Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing, District of Kansas)(Coleman, Bert)
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Forwarded to USM for service.) (dt)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application (Doc. No. #2 ) is therefore GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B), this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for entry of a scheduling order; for decision on all pretrial, non-dispositive motions; and for reports and recommendations on all dispositive motions. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 4/3/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (dt)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order TN State Bar status verified as active for Peter T. Skeie. (dt)
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kathryn Haeuptle. (dt) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/2/2020) (dt).
April 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, filed by Kathryn Haeuptle. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haeuptle v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Haeuptle
Represented By: Peter T. Skeie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Email Notification
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Bert Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?