Talley v. Bert Boyd
Henry Darnell Talley |
State of Tennessee and Bert C. Boyd |
3:2020cv00303 |
April 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
William L Campbell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Bert C. Boyd. (Bolduc, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee by Henry Darnell Talley. (am) |
Filing 8 RECEIPT #34675058866 in the amount of $5.00 posted by Henry Darnell Talley re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (am) |
Filing 7 Letter regarding filing fee from Henry Talley. (am) Modified Date on 5/20/2020 (am). |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Henry Darnell Talley. (am) |
|
TN State Bar status verified as active for Meredith Wood Bowen. (am) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Wood Bowen on behalf of State of Tennessee (Bowen, Meredith) |
Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (am) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Henry Darnell Talley. (am) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Henry Darnell Talley.(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.