Usherson v. Third Man Records, LLC
Arthur Usherson |
Third Man Records, LLC |
3:2020cv00390 |
May 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Jeffery S Frensley |
Eli J Richardson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Withdraw Pro Hac Vice Motion. Signed by Kirk L. Davies on 7/1/20. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(Davies, Kirk) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw Document pro hac vice motion by Arthur Usherson. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#11 : The pending pro hac vice motion does not comply with the Court's local rules, because the motion fails to state whether disciplinary proceedings by any disciplinary authority, a finding of contempt or a sanction under 28 U.S.C. 1927 by any court, or criminal charges have been instituted against the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission. Local Rule 83.01(b)(2). By no later than five (5) business days from the date of this docket annotation, the pro hac vice motion must be supplemented by the filing of a statement under oath of the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission disclosing such matters. Failure to do so will result in denial of the pro hac vice motion. (vh) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for James R. Wiggington. (vh) |
NOTICE TO FILER re DE#11 : The pending pro hac vice motion does not comply with the Court's local rules, because the motion fails to state whether disciplinary proceedings by any disciplinary authority, a finding of contempt or a sanction under 28 U.S.C. 1927 by any court, or criminal charges have been instituted against the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission. Local Rule 83.01(b)(2). By no later than five (5) business days from the date of this docket annotation, the pro hac vice motion must be supplemented by the filing of a statement under oath of the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission disclosing such matters. Failure to do so will result in denial of the pro hac vice motion. (Davies, Kirk) |
Filing 11 ***WITHDRAWN PER DE 13*** MOTION for attorney Richard Liebowitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3165209) by Arthur Usherson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing)(Liebowitz, Richard) Modified on 7/1/2020 (vh). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James R. Wiggington on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wiggington, James) |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Chris L. Vlahos. (vh) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Third Man Records, LLC.(Vlahos, Chris) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Hac Motion and Associate with Local Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 5/28/2020. (vh) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Pro Hac Vice Motion and Associate with Local Counsel by Arthur Usherson. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
Filing 6 ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/6/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/16/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (vh) |
Filing 4 Summons issued as to Third Man Records, LLC. (service copies returned to counsel by mail.) (vh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (vh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Richard P. Liebowitz: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(d)). Appearance by local counsel due by 5/27/2020. (vh) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL Richard P. Liebowitz: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $100.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 5/27/2020. (vh) |
NY State Bar status verified as active for Richard P. Liebowitz. (vh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Third Man Records, LLC (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 0650-3136024), filed by Arthur Usherson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-The Photograph, #2 Exhibit B-Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(vh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Usherson v. Third Man Records, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arthur Usherson | |
Represented By: | Richard P. Liebowitz |
Represented By: | James R. Wiggington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Third Man Records, LLC | |
Represented By: | Chris L. Vlahos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.