Alcorn v. Myers
Petitioner: Dexter Dewayne Alcorn
Respondent: Warden Kevin Myers
Case Number: 3:2020cv00468
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Aleta A Trauger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The petitioner has filed an objection to the notice of appearance filed by Richard Davison Douglas on behalf of Warden Kevin Myers. (Doc. No. #5 ). Accordingly, the petitioner's objection is OVERRULED. On June 29, 2020, the court ordered the petitioner to show cause why his pro se petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies within 30 days of receipt of the court's order and memorandum opinion. (Doc. No. #4 ). While the petitioner has not responded to the court's order, the deadline has not yet passed. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/14/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
July 13, 2020 Filing 5 OBJECTION to Notice of Appearance filed by Dexter Dewayne Alcorn re #3 Notice of Appearance. (mg)
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION: Pending before the court is Dexter Dewayne Alcorn's pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No. #1 ). Petitioner is an inmate of the Turney Center Industrial Complex in Only, Tennessee. After conducting a preliminary review of the petitioner's Section 2254 petition under Rule 4, Rules - Section 2254 Cases, it appears that the petition should be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his petition should not be dismissed for that reason within 30 days of receipt of this Order and Memorandum Opinion. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/29/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified on 7/2/2020 (mg).
June 24, 2020 TN State Bar status verified as active for Richard Davison Douglas. (mg)
June 23, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Davison Douglas on behalf of Kevin Myers (Douglas, Richard)
June 5, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg)
June 5, 2020 Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg)
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34675059016.), filed by Dexter Dewayne Alcorn. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Filing Fee Receipt)(mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alcorn v. Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Kevin Myers
Represented By: Richard Davison Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dexter Dewayne Alcorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?