Alcorn v. Myers
Dexter Dewayne Alcorn |
Warden Kevin Myers |
3:2020cv00468 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Aleta A Trauger |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: The petitioner has filed an objection to the notice of appearance filed by Richard Davison Douglas on behalf of Warden Kevin Myers. (Doc. No. #5 ). Accordingly, the petitioner's objection is OVERRULED. On June 29, 2020, the court ordered the petitioner to show cause why his pro se petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies within 30 days of receipt of the court's order and memorandum opinion. (Doc. No. #4 ). While the petitioner has not responded to the court's order, the deadline has not yet passed. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/14/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to Notice of Appearance filed by Dexter Dewayne Alcorn re #3 Notice of Appearance. (mg) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION: Pending before the court is Dexter Dewayne Alcorn's pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No. #1 ). Petitioner is an inmate of the Turney Center Industrial Complex in Only, Tennessee. After conducting a preliminary review of the petitioner's Section 2254 petition under Rule 4, Rules - Section 2254 Cases, it appears that the petition should be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his petition should not be dismissed for that reason within 30 days of receipt of this Order and Memorandum Opinion. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/29/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified on 7/2/2020 (mg). |
TN State Bar status verified as active for Richard Davison Douglas. (mg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Davison Douglas on behalf of Kevin Myers (Douglas, Richard) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form and Notice of Consent form included.) (mg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34675059016.), filed by Dexter Dewayne Alcorn. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Filing Fee Receipt)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alcorn v. Myers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Kevin Myers | |
Represented By: | Richard Davison Douglas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dexter Dewayne Alcorn | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.