Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stow
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Frederick M. Stow |
| 3:2020cv00489 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Jeffery S Frensley |
| Eli J Richardson |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Order)(Loomis, Madison) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ty E. Howard on behalf of Frederick M. Stow (Howard, Ty) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone set for 8/11/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 8/6/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Frederick M. Stow waiver sent on 6/15/2020. (Loomis, Madison) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for M. Graham Loomis to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Kirk L. Davies on 6/16/20. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(Davies, Kirk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 6/15/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 783 before Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. (mg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (mg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (mg) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Frederick M. Stow. Service copies will be returned to counsel by mail. (mg) Modified on 6/12/2020 (mg). |
| GA State Bar status verified as active for Madison Graham Loomis. (mg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for attorney M. Graham Loomis to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fee Waived) by Securities and Exchange Commission. (mg) Modified on 6/12/2020 (mg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frederick M. Stow, filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stow | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frederick M. Stow | |
| Represented By: | Ty E. Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Madison Graham Loomis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
