Shannon v. Risper et al
Day Quan Shannon |
Rubenard Risper and CoreCivic |
3:2020cv00518 |
June 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Eli J Richardson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: Before the Court is a pro se complaint for alleged violation of civil rights (Doc. No. #1 ). The fee for filing a civil action is $400.00. If Plaintiff is unable to pay the filing fee, he may apply for leave to proceed IFP. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff an appropriate IFP application form. If Plaintiff wishes the Court to consider his complaint, he MUST either pay the full $400.00 filing fee or submit a proper IFP application. Plaintiff's submission must be RECEIVED in this Court within 30 days of the entry of this Order and must include the docket number assigned to this case, No. 3:20-cv-00518. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 7/24/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail w/blank IFP short form. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (vh) |
Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet & certificate of service form included). (vh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CoreCivic and Rubenard Risper, filed by Day Quan Shannon. (Filing fee not paid)(vh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.