Curtis v. Boyd
| 3:2020cv00559 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 3/29/2023. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 9/28/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Petitioner: "Motion for Enlargement of Time to Allow Respondent to Complete the Record" (Doc. No. 29 ) and "Motion for the Habeas Court to take Judicial Notice of State Court Filings Under Rule 2254(f)" (Doc. No. 32 ). Respondent has not responded to either motion. The Court has not yet decided Petitioner's claims using the pleadings and current state-court record. Therefore, to the extent Pet itioner seeks to expand the state court record, the Court DENIES Petitioner's request at this time. Petitioner asks for an extension of time to submit a substantive Reply to the Answer after the Court rules on his pending motions. Petitioner&# 039;s request is GRANTED. In summary, Respondent SHALL respond to Petitioner's allegations that certain relevant documents are missing from the state court record within 14 days of entry of this Order. Further, Respondent SHALL file a complete transcript of Petitioner's hearing on his Motion for a New Trial within 14 days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 5/18/2021. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Douglas W. Curtis, an inmate of the Northeast Correctional Complex in Mountain City, Tennessee, filed a pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 2016 conviction. For t he reasons explained herein, Petitioner's motions for discovery (Doc. No. 2 ) and to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 17 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Petitioner's motion to compel Respondent to complete the record (Doc. No. 18 ) is DENIED as premature. Respondent shall comply with the instructions set forth in the Order entered on July 15, 2020, within 30 days of entry of this Order. (Doc. No. 7 ). Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 11/16/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curtis v. Boyd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
